<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Almost Lost A Priceless Domain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2007/07/13/almost-lost-a-priceless-domain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2007/07/13/almost-lost-a-priceless-domain/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2007/07/13/almost-lost-a-priceless-domain/#comment-9799</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:20:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2007/07/13/almost-lost-a-priceless-domain/#comment-9799</guid>
		<description>Having someone you already trust to look after your domains seems like a great idea.

Sometimes, it seems a bit strange to think we trust our valuable domain names to complete strangers especially when they turn out to be &lt;a href="http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/index.php?s=registerfly" rel="nofollow"&gt;fraudsters&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having someone you already trust to look after your domains seems like a great idea.</p>
<p>Sometimes, it seems a bit strange to think we trust our valuable domain names to complete strangers especially when they turn out to be <a href="http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/index.php?s=registerfly" rel="nofollow">fraudsters</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SarahG</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2007/07/13/almost-lost-a-priceless-domain/#comment-9792</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 13:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2007/07/13/almost-lost-a-priceless-domain/#comment-9792</guid>
		<description>Yeah I've got a deal with a friend who runs our ADSL and has his own Nominet tag so I'm moving my domains to him at some point. It may cost a couple of quid extra but that cost is saved on my time that I've wasted dealing with 123-reg!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I&#8217;ve got a deal with a friend who runs our ADSL and has his own Nominet tag so I&#8217;m moving my domains to him at some point. It may cost a couple of quid extra but that cost is saved on my time that I&#8217;ve wasted dealing with 123-reg!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2007/07/13/almost-lost-a-priceless-domain/#comment-9768</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2007/07/13/almost-lost-a-priceless-domain/#comment-9768</guid>
		<description>Sometimes I wish I could leave clients to manage their own domains and leave me out of the loop so it's entirely their responsibility to renew on time, but I just know that it would make things harder for me in terms of things like nameserver changes or having to get involved in redeeming!

I'm starting to look at names.co.uk for my .uk domains rather than 123-reg.  Although I've not had any trouble with 123-reg, a lot of other people seem to have.  Also, if PIPEX are running the show then there's good enough reason to start looking elsewhere...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes I wish I could leave clients to manage their own domains and leave me out of the loop so it&#8217;s entirely their responsibility to renew on time, but I just know that it would make things harder for me in terms of things like nameserver changes or having to get involved in redeeming!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m starting to look at names.co.uk for my .uk domains rather than 123-reg.  Although I&#8217;ve not had any trouble with 123-reg, a lot of other people seem to have.  Also, if PIPEX are running the show then there&#8217;s good enough reason to start looking elsewhere&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SarahG</title>
		<link>http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2007/07/13/almost-lost-a-priceless-domain/#comment-9760</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 09:58:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2007/07/13/almost-lost-a-priceless-domain/#comment-9760</guid>
		<description>Ouch, that redemption fee is so annoying. I've never been hit with it but one of my clients never paid up for his domain (even calling to tell me to stop hassling him for the invoice payment after we sent him a reminder) and when he finally realised, in was in redemption so he had to pay up the $160 fee.

Recently my actual business domain wasn't renewed at Nominet by 123-reg despite me renewing it with them. Nominet emailed me the day after expiry and then I had to spend my morning getting it all sorted out with 123-reg before I lost my business email!

My .coms and .nets that I want to keep, I set to auto register at eNom. There's always cash in the account and it just means I can forget about them and leave them renewing when the time comes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch, that redemption fee is so annoying. I&#8217;ve never been hit with it but one of my clients never paid up for his domain (even calling to tell me to stop hassling him for the invoice payment after we sent him a reminder) and when he finally realised, in was in redemption so he had to pay up the $160 fee.</p>
<p>Recently my actual business domain wasn&#8217;t renewed at Nominet by 123-reg despite me renewing it with them. Nominet emailed me the day after expiry and then I had to spend my morning getting it all sorted out with 123-reg before I lost my business email!</p>
<p>My .coms and .nets that I want to keep, I set to auto register at eNom. There&#8217;s always cash in the account and it just means I can forget about them and leave them renewing when the time comes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
