Comments on: PageRank Updates http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2006/09/30/pagerank-updates/ Sat, 31 Dec 2011 08:16:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Google Success http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2006/09/30/pagerank-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-298 Google Success Fri, 06 Oct 2006 18:31:44 +0000 http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2006/09/30/pagerank-updates/#comment-298 Well, Google covers most of it in their guidelines for webmasters. As most search engine algorithms are assumed to incorporate tools for checking grammar, synonyms, I'd presume good site content as one having 1. Contextual relevance: Text contains numerous terms related to the site theme and keywords, using stem variations of the keywords. 2. Frequent updating of content - at least once in every few weeks. 3. Minimum Spelling and grammar mistakes 4. Good readability - Clear paragraphs, few or no long blocks of text, moderate sentence length, no slang words. 5. More of text content than images, flash media etc. 6. Text linking to naviagate to all pages within the site. Well, Google covers most of it in their guidelines for webmasters.

As most search engine algorithms are assumed to incorporate tools for checking grammar, synonyms, I’d presume good site content as one having

1. Contextual relevance: Text contains numerous terms related to the site theme and keywords, using stem variations of the keywords.

2. Frequent updating of content – at least once in every few weeks.

3. Minimum Spelling and grammar mistakes

4. Good readability – Clear paragraphs, few or no long blocks of text, moderate sentence length, no slang words.

5. More of text content than images, flash media etc.

6. Text linking to naviagate to all pages within the site.

]]> By: Will http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2006/09/30/pagerank-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-286 Will Wed, 04 Oct 2006 17:00:11 +0000 http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2006/09/30/pagerank-updates/#comment-286 <blockquote>If the website has good content it can get a page rank of 3 or 4 without many backlinks</blockquote> Question: How do you define "good content"?

If the website has good content it can get a page rank of 3 or 4 without many backlinks

Question: How do you define “good content”?

]]> By: Google Success http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2006/09/30/pagerank-updates/comment-page-1/#comment-266 Google Success Sun, 01 Oct 2006 13:25:45 +0000 http://www.internetmarketingfool.com/2006/09/30/pagerank-updates/#comment-266 Good to know you have a shiny PR of 5 now ! With experiements I have done with my websites, I found that Google is particularly kind to websites which are around 3-4 months old. If the website has good content it can get a page rank of 3 or 4 without many backlinks. But the real task is moving from 4 to the upper echelon. Also what matters is the website category. My only website which had a drop in PR was the one where I tried some spam techniques. It shows that Google algorithm can not be fooled easily. Good to know you have a shiny PR of 5 now !
With experiements I have done with my websites, I found that Google is particularly kind to websites which are around 3-4 months old. If the website has good content it can get a page rank of 3 or 4 without many backlinks. But the real task is moving from 4 to the upper echelon. Also what matters is the website category. My only website which had a drop in PR was the one where I tried some spam techniques. It shows that Google algorithm can not be fooled easily.

]]>